Examples
Z -> Z
Z -> Z/6Z
C -> C
Z/6Z -> Z/2Z
Q[X] -> Q[X]/(X2)
R[X]/(X2 + 1) -> R + Ri
The map f : Z -> Z given by f(a) =
3a is not a morphism of rings because f(1) is not equal to 1.
The map
f :
Z ->
Z/6
Z given by
f(
a) =
a + 6
Z is a morphism of rings:
-
f(0) = 0 + 6Z,
- f(1) = 1 + 6Z,
- f(a + b) = (a + b) + 6Z =
(a + 6Z) + (b + 6Z) =
f(a) + f(b), and
-
f(ab) = (ab) + 6Z =
(a + 6Z) * (b + 6Z) =
f(a) * f(b).
The kernel of the map is exactly 6Z.
Complex conjugation is a morphism of rings C -> C. In fact,
it is an isomorphism: It is its own inverse.
The map
f :
Z/6Z -> Z/2Z given by
f(a + 6Z) = a + 2Z is a morphism of
rings. The kernel consists of all a + 6Z for a
Z such that a = 0 mod 2. The
kernel is therefore {0, 2, 4}. It is not hard to verify that f is
surjective.
The morphism
f :
Q[
X] ->
Q[
X]/(
X2) which sends a polynomial
to its class modulo
X2 is a morphism as is easily verified.
The kernel of this morphism consists of all polynomials that are divisible
by X2. The morphism is surjective, so the image
is the whole ring Q[X]/(X2).
The map
f :
R[
X]/(
X2 + 1)
->
R +
Ri,
where
i is the usual imaginary number (square root of -1),
is defined by
g + (X2 + 1) -> g(i),
for every residue class g + (X2 + 1)
R[X]/(X2 + 1).
Observe that it is indeed well defined. This follows from the fact that
if g - h is divisible
by X2 + 1, then g(i) = h(i).
So g + (X2 + 1) = h + (X2 + 1) implies g(i) = h(i).
This map is in fact an isomorphism. The inverse map is given by
a + bi -> a + bX + (X2 + 1),
as can be easily checked.