Except where explicitly  noted  in  individual files, these programs
and files are Copyright April 1999 by Carey Bloodworth.

This includes, but is not limited to:

  common/ini.c            By me.  Public domain.
  common/malloc6.c        (mostly) By D.J. Delorie.  GNU Copyright.
  gcc586/vector.c.        By Jason P. Public domain
  c586/vector.c           By me.  Public domain
  fftstuff/ooura/fft.c    By T. Ooura.  Copyright.
  fftstuff/ooura2/fft.c   By T. Ooura.  Copyright
  fftstuff/hartley/fft.c  Hartley transform is patented.
                          (see docs for further information.)


I retain all legal rights and ownership.  All files are provided "as
is", without any warranty, suitability of use, etc.  These files and
programs are being provided in  the  interest of sharing of a hobby.
If you do not agree to these terms, then do not use them.

I give you permission to use these as needed, without asking me  for
permission,  informing me of your use, or any form of payment.  Feel
free to use them if you need to.

I do, however, have one restriction and one requirement.

First,  you  must  not put the GNU license (often called 'Copyleft')
onto this product or any code,  data, docs, etc. that you extract or
develop directly from it.  You can, of course, do what you want with
your own original code, docs, data,  etc.   Just as long as it's not
mine.

Second, you must include a  notice in your code and/or documentation
that the ideas or code came from me.  I've put a lot  of  work  into
these  and  it's  just  fair  that  my  name  is  included  in there
somewhere.  You don't have  to  provide  a massive explanation, or a
copy  of my original code, although you can if you wish to.  But you
need to include some notice  that  I was involved somehow.  On major
projects, I try to give credit where it's due, because it's fair.  I
just  want  you  to  do  the  same.   Being  included  in  something
comparable to my list of "thank you's" would sufice.

Beyond those two things, you can do whatever you want.  You can even
market it commercially, if  there  was  actually  a  market  for  pi
programs.  (Baring any other licensing  restrictions  of  any  other
code that might be included, of course.)


April 29, 1999

Carey Bloodworth
cbloodworth@juno.com

[Non-legal personal note:

Just in case you are curious, the reason  this  entire  thing  isn't
public  domain is because I have indeed put a lot of work into these
programs and I just want to be  sure that if somebody does use these
in their own stuff, that my name be included.  Perhaps  that's  ego.
Or  perhaps that's just 'fair'.  Whichever it is, though, that's the
main reason it's not all in the Public Domain.

As for the restriction...

To  be  blunt,  I  don't  like  the  GNU  license.   I  think   it's
restrictive,  and far far more complex and difficult to read than it
needs to be.  I've tried  several  times  to read and understand it,
and there's so much legalesse in there  that  my  eyes  glaze  over.
Maybe  Richard  Stallman's brother is a lawyer or something, I don't
know.  But a  complicated,  unreadable  license  like  they use goes
against the very concept the  Free  Software  Foundation  claims  to
stand for.  Even the licenses from Microsoft aren't that complicated
and  hard to read!  In short, I don't approve of the GNU license and
I don't want any part  of  it.   If  they really believed the things
they claimed, they would have at least attempted to make the license
readable by the average programmer.

]


