Watershed analysis and watershed management are developing as tools of integrated ecological and economic study and decision making at a regional scale. The new technology and thinking brought with the advent of Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) is very much complimentary to some of the paradigms of watershed management.
The watershed management approach has emerged as a holistic and integral way of research, analysis and decision making in a watershed scale. The major impetus of watershed management stems from the understanding that science needs to be linked to planning, and that decision making should be based on broad citizens involvement. In both cases it is important that the information be shared between the stake holders and that it be processed into a format readily percieved by wide and diverse groups, institutions and individuals.
The concept of watershed management approach has
made its way to the front stage of environmental research very
much in conjunction with the concerns about sustainability and
sustainable development. Once it has been realized that sustainability
is a systems property and that it requires economic concerns to
be considered within the framework of ecological options available
and values of the society to be brought in harmony with the carrying
capacities of the environment, it started to become clear that
the existing administrative and sociogeographic boundaries are
not really designed to take into account both the socioeconomic
and ecological features of systems. Watersheds seemed to be a
reasonable alternative, taking into account the ecological properties
of an area as well as the socioeconomic ones.
An important advantage of a watershed approach is that the borders associated with it are objective. Instead of being result of some historical, subjective, oftentimes unfair, voluntaristic or contradictory process, they are totally based on certain geographical characteristics such as relief, which is difficult to change and makes little sense to oppose. In this sense a watershed is a perfect geographic unit around which to build consensus among the multitude of administrative, legal, and public bodies located within.
The watershed concept implies certain geographical
characteristics, such as topography, that delimit the territory
not only with respect to water flow, but also with respect to
other flows: energy, material and information. The watershed boundaries
may influence the local atmospheric transport and local climate,
migration flows and the associated patterns of species distribution,
as well as dispersion flows of pollution. In this respect the
flow of water is serving just as an indicator of the relief and
landscape characteristics, on the one hand, and as an integrator
of many of the processes occurring within the watershed, on the
other.
It may be noted that besides the water quality aspect, the watershed criteria for regioning may as well be applied in taking into account other factors, both of ecological and social origin. Historically human settlements have been tending towards sources of water, rivers being the main ones. As a result, most of the human population and the associated manmade pollution and other environmental stress is usually tied to the river network. Therefore the watershed concept has also a social meaning, which is especially important if we are analyzing the ecological processes with respect to external anthropogenic effects. This social aspect is also put into play when the management strategies have to be considered and when the contradicting interests of various parties located along the same resource (or sink) begin counteracting.
The decision making process should
be fundamentally restructured in order to take into account all
the subsystems in their integrity and all the stake holders with
all the diversity of their potentially contradicting interests
and concerns. The complexity of this goal is challenging and it
can be hardly tackled without innovative technology such as computer
modeling and Internet communications. While computer simulations
and data processing has been widely recognized and implemented,
the advantages of the Internet for watershed management have not
been adequately explored.
In any case regional management implies a close interaction
and linkage between the numerous agents acting in the region.
The efficiency of this interaction is a function of the information
that is shared among and used by all the stake holders. In many
cases it depends not as much on the quality and amount of the
information available, what science has been mostly concerned
with all this time, but rather on how well the information is
disseminate, shared and used. And that is exactly the function
that the Internet and the World Wide Web, as a substantial part
of it, can offer.
There is a number of features that make WWW an exceptionally important tool for watershed analysis in particular and for regional management in general.
|
A watershed management web page can be considered
as a problem oriented web page that contains the state
of the art of data and methods available for decision making in
a particular geographic region of a watershed. Web pages
of this sort are driven by a certain problem and serve as a means
of interactive communication, rather than passive informing.
Major agents of the watershed management approach presented on
the Web and linked together
The numerous stake-holders and interest groups on a watershed can represent themselves in separate web pages that are linked to the root page and cross-referenced when necessary. They are also invited to submit a brief summary of their activities and concerns that will be placed on the root page. Already this stage can be an important part of the consensus building process, when all the varying concerns get summarized at one web site, and it is made open for discussion and can be monitoring a corresponding bulletin-board that serves the purposes of exchanging current opinions and information on hot issues. Three immediate benefits of this clearly emerge:
A watershed landscape model serves as a core of the page, bringing together the geographic, ecological and socioeconomic data about the watershed and its subsystems. It also helps identify the gaps in information, and its data base becomes the reference book and repository for future research and measurements in the area. It is further linked to other more detailed models and methods that describe different processes or phenomena on the watershed and help preprocess and understand the data.
The social, physical and ecological domains become essentially linked and counteracting. To make a case, a stake holder needs physical, socioeconomic or ecological data, which is readily provided by the watershed data base. He may need to refer to some modeling or data-processing techniques to illustrate his point. These methods are also provided from the web, with applets, that accompany data for simple evaluations, or forms that can be filed and scenarios that can be ordered from the full-scale model or its submodules.
The results are immediately posted on the web and
made available for discussion and decision making. The web serves
to integrate the knowledge and data available at different institutions
and sites, and to offer it to the potential user.
E-mail to Alexey Voinov